Yes, interesting how once again the court is so similar. I'd offer another initial read of this court as "communication is confined to let through only one sort". The answer to the question, if the Judge answered it in one word, would be "change". I tend to see it as a piece of evidence toward a yes answer.
*If* this is correctly read with Querent in 1st and Quesited in 12th, then yes, given the mix of aspects positive and negative, I agree that it's more a no than a yes-- though I think that the square and opposition aspects suggest that there are certain factors in play that threaten to destabilize the readings.
And *if* it's actually answered by looking at perfection between 9th and 12th, then I also agree that this was a strong "Yes".
Let's talk about that Rubeus in the first. I wouldn't throw out the reading by any means, but saving particular signs of lies or danger, I would take this as a warning that you are mistaken about something in how you asked the question. I am not inside your head, so please offer some guidance for what sounds plausible here, but a couple of possibilities that come to mind about what Rubeus could portend:
1. You didn't ask the question you thought you were asking, in that your phrasing had a different nuance than you intended. For instance, given the phrase "Have any of my COVID *queries* been tampered with by outside forces?", the answer might be "no", no outside force messed with the questions you asked, but they did mess the answer!
2. You didn't ask the question you thought you were asking, in that I requested you for a reading about whether your vaccine divination had been tampered with, and you asked about Covid divinations instead, which is arguably a different thing.
3. Perhaps it's a warning meaning something along the lines of, "Well, literally speaking no outside forces messed with your divinations, but inner forces did, skewing your readings".
Do any of these feel like possibilities to you, based on your own internal knowledge of your own situation and viewpoint? If so, any one of them could account for the way that (if perfection between 1st and 12th is the right way to read the chart) there are aspects that both support and oppose an affirmative answer to the question.
no subject
Yes, interesting how once again the court is so similar. I'd offer another initial read of this court as "communication is confined to let through only one sort". The answer to the question, if the Judge answered it in one word, would be "change". I tend to see it as a piece of evidence toward a yes answer.
*If* this is correctly read with Querent in 1st and Quesited in 12th, then yes, given the mix of aspects positive and negative, I agree that it's more a no than a yes-- though I think that the square and opposition aspects suggest that there are certain factors in play that threaten to destabilize the readings.
And *if* it's actually answered by looking at perfection between 9th and 12th, then I also agree that this was a strong "Yes".
Let's talk about that Rubeus in the first. I wouldn't throw out the reading by any means, but saving particular signs of lies or danger, I would take this as a warning that you are mistaken about something in how you asked the question. I am not inside your head, so please offer some guidance for what sounds plausible here, but a couple of possibilities that come to mind about what Rubeus could portend:
1. You didn't ask the question you thought you were asking, in that your phrasing had a different nuance than you intended. For instance, given the phrase "Have any of my COVID *queries* been tampered with by outside forces?", the answer might be "no", no outside force messed with the questions you asked, but they did mess the answer!
2. You didn't ask the question you thought you were asking, in that I requested you for a reading about whether your vaccine divination had been tampered with, and you asked about Covid divinations instead, which is arguably a different thing.
3. Perhaps it's a warning meaning something along the lines of, "Well, literally speaking no outside forces messed with your divinations, but inner forces did, skewing your readings".
Do any of these feel like possibilities to you, based on your own internal knowledge of your own situation and viewpoint? If so, any one of them could account for the way that (if perfection between 1st and 12th is the right way to read the chart) there are aspects that both support and oppose an affirmative answer to the question.